Articles Posted by Meghan Lawlor

When Congress passed, and President Trump signed, the budget reconciliation bill H.R. 1 (commonly referred to as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”), they established a new investment vehicle: Trump Accounts. Though frequently thought about only in connection with their most widely-publicized component – a $1,000 pilot contribution by the federal government – Trump Accounts are many-legged beasts. To take advantage of the “free money” pilot contribution from the government and the jump start it can provide to a child’s savings, it is crucial to become familiar with Trump Accounts’ many legs and pitfalls.

First Leg: Establishing the Account

Section 530A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) allows an authorized individual – a parent, legal guardian, adult sibling, or grandparent – to file IRS Form 4547. The Form serves as an election to establish a Trump Account for a qualified individual. In order to qualify, the individual must not have attained age 18 by the end of the calendar year in which the election is made and must have a Social Security number issued before the date of the election.

Published on:
Updated:

Many people direct the disposition of their bank accounts, investments, retirement accounts and life insurance upon their death by designating beneficiaries of those assets. When an asset passes by beneficiary designation, otherwise called a pay-on-death provision, it becomes a non-probate asset and therefore passes outside of a person’s probate estate.

In New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, among other states, a divorce automatically revokes any provisions in a will which benefit a former spouse, unless the will expressly states otherwise. Similarly, New Jersey statute 3B:3-14 provides that a divorce revokes any revocable appointment directing the disposition of property – such as a beneficiary designation – to a former spouse unless the governing instrument, court order, or divorce agreement dividing marital assets expressly states otherwise.

This year, the New Jersey Supreme Court considered whether a decedent’s pay-on-death provision on his U.S. savings bonds survived his divorce and satisfied the terms of his divorce settlement agreement (“DSA”). The decedent, Michael Jones (“Michael”), bought Series EE U.S. savings bonds while married to Jeanine Jones (“Jeanine”) and named her as the pay-on-death beneficiary of the bonds. When Michael and Jeanine divorced in 2018, the DSA required Michael to pay Jeanine $200,000 over time and also stated that any marital asset not specifically listed in the DSA “belong[ed] to the party who ha[d] it currently in their possession.” The DSA did not explicitly mention the savings bonds.

Contact Information